Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management 5C Marketing Analysis
Posted by Sabrina Warren on Jan-10-2018
1 What is 5C marketing framework?
5C marketing framework is a tool to analyze the situational forces that form the business environment. The analysis emphasizes micro and macro environmental factors that exert a strong influence on the organizations' business operations. Marketing managers can conduct the 5C analysis to timely identify the strengths and weaknesses in the internal environment, and possible risks and opportunities present in the external environment.
2 Application of the 5C model on Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
2.1 Company
Some examples of the company related factors are given below:
2.1.1 Research and development
Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management spends heavily on the research and development activities to preserve its leadership position in various product segments. Heavy investment in building the IT network, marketing, product design and process optimization supports the distribution and promotion strategies.
2.1.2 Culture
Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management has a strong culture of process and product innovation. Top management supports the innovative and creative ideas, and employees are encouraged to participate in the problem solving process. The organizational culture supports the vision, mission and values.
2.1.3 Scale of production
Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Managementhas a large scale of production, which enables the company to achieve the benefits of economies of scale. Large scale production enhances the competitive strength of the company and enables the company to produce better quality products at reduced costs.
2.1.4 SWOT-Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
The SWOT analysis is an effective tool to analyze the company related factors. Application of this tool in Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management’ context involves identification of key strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
The following table presents the SWOT in the concisely summarized form:
Strengths:
|
Weaknesses:
|
Opportunities:
|
Threats:
|
2.2 Customers
Customer analysis mainly covers the following points:
2.2.1 Market segments
- Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management targets both high end and low-end market segments.
- The organization's decision to choose broader and multiple segments have expanded the scope of opportunities.
- The targeted segments are expected to have a steady market growth rate in future.
- The primary customer segment of the Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management is the family with children, which requires Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to do social, emotional and functional jobs to keep this market segment happy and satisfied. The functional job includes performing core operations, the social job includes providing augmented services to promote family and social gatherings, and emotional job includes showing concern and commitment to take care of customers.
2.2.2 Frequency and quantity of purchases
- The quantity and frequency of purchase in the targeted market are high, and both are favorable growth indicators for the organization.
- Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management can adapt its marketing strategies according to changes in frequency and quantity by offering more discounts and family deals.
2.2.3 Brand loyalty
- Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management operates in the low-involvement product category.
- Usually, developing brand loyalty in low-involvement markets is challenging compared to high-involvement markets as a lot of alternative options are available and psychological switching costs are also low.
- Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management ’ customers are price sensitive. Their price sensitivity, changing tastes and preferences and high health consciousness requires Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to invest in customer research activities and closely monitor their attitude and consumption behavior.
2.2.4 Customer needs
- It is important to identify the critical customer desired features and incorporate them into marketing and advertising strategies.
- Customers changing attitudes towards healthy alternatives and prioritizing the quality over price also have important consequences for the organization.
2.3 Competitors
Porter five forces is a useful tool to conduct competitor analysis:
2.3.1 Bargaining power of buyers
- Strong bargaining power of buyers puts downward pressure on pricing and induces Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to offer the high quality product at discounted pricing.
- Strong bargaining power makes it easier for Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management ’ customers to switch to other alternatives.
- There are three major reasons for strong buyer bargaining power:
- High substitute availability.
- A wide number of alternatives.
- Low economic and psychological switching costs.
2.3.2 Bargaining power of suppliers
- Weak bargaining power of supplier makes it comparatively less important strategic issue for Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management as suppliers cannot dictate the prices and have to accept the Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management ’ terms and conditions.
- Three factors result in moderate to weak supplier power:
- A large number of suppliers
- High overall supply
- Suppliers’ weak control over their distribution network
2.3.3 Competitive rivalry
- Currently, the rivalry among competitors is high, which makes it difficult for Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to achieve its market growth objectives.
- The product differentiation is low and setting the differentiation basis has become increasingly challenging.
- Intense competitive rivalry is a major reason for Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management ’ declining profitability.
2.3.4 Threat of substitutes
- The technological advancement has raised the threat of substitutes for Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management .
- Changing trends towards healthy products also raises the consequences of this threat for Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management .
- Overall, the threat of substitutes is strong for the following reasons:
- High performance/cost ratio of substitute products.
- High availability of substitute products.
- Low switching cost.
2.3.5 Threat of new entrants
- Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management faces moderate new entrant threat, which means new entrants do not have a significant influence on Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management ’ market share.
- High level marketing know-how with huge expenditure on marketing activities is required to enter the industry.
- Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management faces a moderate threat of new entrants for the following reasons:
- High brand development cost weakens the threat.
- Low switching cost increases the threat.
- High capital cost weakens the threat.
2.4 Collaborators
- An in-depth collaborator analysis requires Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to conduct a detailed value chain analysis and carefully consider the bargaining power of suppliers to explore the collaboration opportunities.
- Collaborators include the downstream and upstream value chain partners, business allies, community leaders, government and others. To choose the appropriate collaborator partners, Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management needs to evaluate different value chain factors, like- value chain flexibility, efficiency, agility, revenue sharing among value chain partners and strengths and weaknesses of possible collaborators. The detailed collaborator analysis can allow Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to enhance and its supply chain efficiency and increase control over it through vertical integration.
- When operating at the international stage, multinational organizations like Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management must understand the local preferences of their customers and make all decisions (ranging from production to marketing) accordingly.
- An agile and flexible supply chain can make collaboration easier for Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management .
- Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management has partnered with various collaborators that allowed the company to develop new product lines and enhance the product development and distribution process.
- It is important for Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to understand the behaviors, relationships, choices, purpose and
context of collaborators to make the right decision. Some important points that must be integrated into
the collaborator analysis are:
- What is the business environment in which potential collaborators operate and what strategies they are using to play in the market?
- What are their key strategic priorities and choices?
- What are their internal and external communication mechanisms?
- What are their key strengths and weaknesses, and what opportunities and threats external environment imposed on them?
2.5 Context
Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management must understand the external environmental context in which it is operating to make the right business decisions and forecast the future. One important tool to understand business context is the PEST analysis.
2.5.1 Political Context
Understanding the political context requires Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to identify possible political issues such as labor or tax laws, changing trade regulations or legislative problems.
- The present governance system requires Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to study the changing government policies closely
- Presence in multiple markets increases the risk of political instability.
- The geo political risks have increased for Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management due to recent developments in the global political scenario.
2.5.2 Social Context
Understanding the social context requires Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to analyze the major trends in culture, education and demographic patterns.
- A general rise in the health consciousness of customers imposes a risk to the Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management .
- Population growth and rising low-end market segments offer opportunities to Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- The attitude towards migration in markets where Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management is present requires the company to consider its impact on changing demographics carefully.
2.5.3 Economic Context
Understanding the economic context requires Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to identify major economic issues like growth in important economic indicators, changes in the labor costs and business cycle stages.
- Inflation exerts a strong impact on the pricing structure of Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management .
- Presence in multiple markets requires marketing managers of Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to adapt their strategies according to consumer behavior, which is different during recession and boom.
- The downward market pressure and changes in customers’ purchasing power should also be considered to make effective marketing strategies.
2.5.4 Technological Context
Understanding the technological context requires Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to understand recent technological developments and their impact on the organization’s cost structure and other business operations.
- The entrance of new market players and their investment in research and development requires Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to protect their intellectual property rights.
- The technological advancement has shortened the product life cycles, requiring Empirical Differences Between Roe-Growing and Roe-Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management to enhance its value chain efficiency.
- Technological development has lowered production cost and increased the need to restructure the supply chain.
Overall, the purpose of understanding the context is to determine if any opportunities or risks are imposed by major external environmental forces.
3 Conclusion
Collecting the information about all 5 C elements (company, customers, competitors, collaborators and context) is a first step towards developing effective and informed marketing strategies. 5C analysis sets the foundation for developing a wise and well-defined marketing plan.
4 References
Armstrong, G. M., Kotler, P., Harker, M. J., & Brennan, R. (2018). Marketing: an introduction. London: Pearson UK.
Bradt, G., (2017). Consider 5Cs--Customers, Collaborators, Capabilities, Competitors, Conditions--In Onboarding Prep. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgebradt/2017/11/22/consider-5cs-customers-collaborators-capabilities-competitors-conditions-in-onboarding-prep/#34f1dd4f321c
Dobbs, M. (2014). Guidelines for applying Porter’s five forces framework: A set of industry analysis templates. Competitiveness Review, 24(1), 32-45.
Grundy, T. (2006). Rethinking and reinventing Michael Porter’s five forces model. Strategic Change, 15(5), 213-229.
Jones, S. C. (2002). Summary of Rossiter’s article on ‘Forms of Marketing Knowledge’. Marketing Theory, 2(4), 333-337.
Mathur, D. (2018). Policing: Reinvention Strategies in a Marketing Framework. South Asian Journal of Management, 25(2), 214-216.
Schmidt, C. R. (2017). Technology's impact on the marketing function. Strategic Management, 22(3), 19-28.
Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International journal of production economics, 111(2), 299-315.
Weinstein, A. (2016). Superior customer value: Strategies for winning and retaining customers. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Weinstein, A. (2018). Superior Customer Value: Finding and Keeping Customers in the New Economy. Abingdon: Routledge.
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Related Articles
- Corporate Social Responsibility of Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- The vision statement of Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- Organizational Culture of Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management Generic and Intensive Growth Strategies
- Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management Case Study Analysis & Solution
- Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management Case Solution
- Ansoff Matrix of Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- Blue Ocean Strategy of Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- Hofstede Cultural Model of Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- Porters Diamond Model of Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- Mckinsey 7s Framework Of Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- Resource Based View Of The Firm - Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- VRIN/VRIO Analysis Of Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- Net Present Value (NPV) Analysis of Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
- WACC for Empirical Differences Between Roe Growing and Roe Declining Firms in Resource Sourcing Allocation and Management
Benjamin Loca
5.0
I land on this service time after time whenever I need for an assignment. It doesn’t even matter if I call this service at midnight, it's really all the time available for me.
Yeboi Sadan
5.0
The best decision was ever to pick up this service. The data was according to the requirements of the subject. Thanks a lot!
Richel Jim
5.0
Got hold of assignment with a small delay. While the paper was fine. Thanks!
Marry Taylor
5.0
Which type of experience with this company, I would like to share. The order process was very easy and the support team liked me as the expert who started the work on the paper. I got the assignment and proofread it. Every point was explained and the design of the letter of transmittal was fine. Thank you!
Eileen Channon
5.0
The support agent notified me about the completion of the paper. I received the document without even a minute late and was happy after its assessment because the paper was splendid.
Dalma Rego
5.0
I'll continue on this service for all my remaining papers. The expert eliminated the errors that I spoke for.
Next Articles
- 45863-A-Structural-Approach-to-Ethical-Reasoning-The-Integration-of-Moral-Philosophy-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 45864-Expanding-the-Competitive-Profile-Matrix-CPM-Introducing-the-Financial-Competitive-Profile-Matrix-FCPM-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 45865-Protecting-Information-Active-Cyber-Defence-for-the-Business-Entity-A-Prerequisite-Corporate-Policy-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 45866-How-Employees-Perceptions-of-Competency-Models-Affect-Job-Satisfaction-Mediating-Effect-of-Social-Exchange-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 45867-Impact-of-Mobile-Platform-Strategy-on-Platform-Generativity-and-Competition-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 45868-Investment-Analysts-Impact-on-CEO-Appointments-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 45869-Viewing-the-Miles-and-Snow-Framework-Through-a-Real-Options-Lens-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 45870-Salience-of-Stakeholders-and-Humanistic-and-Sustainability-Practices-Among-Phil-FMCG-Companies-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 45871-The-Impact-of-Venture-Capital-on-Funding-Amounts-Promised-in-Alliance-Contracts-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 45872-CEO-Directors-Going-It-Alone-or-Clustering-on-Boards-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
Previous Articles
- 1-Making-the-Case-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 2-Joe-Smith-s-Closing-Analysis-B-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 3-Joe-Smith-s-Closing-Analysis-A-Spanish-Version-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 4-GMAC-The-Pipeline-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 5-On-Writing-Teaching-Notes-Well-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 6-Exxon-Corp-Trouble-at-Valdez-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 7-Ashland-Oil-Inc-Trouble-at-Floreffe-A-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 8-Ashland-Oil-Inc-Trouble-at-Floreffe-B-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 9-Ashland-Oil-Inc-Trouble-at-Floreffe-C-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
- 10-Ashland-Oil-Inc-Trouble-at-Floreffe-D-Five-Cs-Of-Marketing
Be a Great Writer or Hire a Greater One!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Essay48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!