- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
Mckinsey 7s Framework Of Complexity and Error in Medicine
Posted by Matthew Harvey on Feb-11-2020
Introduction
The McKinsey 7s model is a strategic tool and framework that helps managers and businesses assess their performance. The McKinsey 7s model identifies 7 key elements for an organization that need to be focused and aligned for successful change management processes as well as for regular performance enhancements.
Figure 1 McKinsey 7S Model
The 7 elements identified in the McKinsey 7s model can be categorized as being hard or soft in nature. They are identified as:
Hard Elements | Soft Elements |
---|---|
Shared Values | |
Strategy | Skills |
Structure | Style |
Systems | Staff |
Figure 2 Hard and Soft elements of the McKinsey 7S Model
Complexity and Error in Medicine makes use of the McKinsey 7s model to regularly enhance its performance, and implement successful change management processes. Complexity and Error in Medicine focuses on the 7 elements identified in the model to ensure that its performance levels are consistently maintained, and improved for the offerings.
1. Hard elements
The hard elements of the McKinsey 7s model comprise of strategy, structure, and systems. The hard elements of the model are easier to identify, more tangible in nature, and directly controlled and influenced by the leadership and management of the organization.
1.1. Strategy
1.1.1. Clearly defined
The strategic direction and the overall business strategy for Complexity and Error in Medicine are clearly defined and communicated to all the employees and stakeholders. This helps the organization manage performance, guide actions, and devise different tactics that are aligned with the business strategy. Moreover, the business strategy’s definition and communication also make operations for Complexity and Error in Medicine more transparent and aligns the responsibilities and actions of the company.
1.1.2. Guiding behaviour for goal attainment
The strategic direction for Complexity and Error in Medicine is also important in helping the business guide employee, staff, and stakeholder behaviour towards the attainment and achievement of goals. SMART Goals are set with short and long term deadlines in accordance with the business strategy. The business strategy helps employees decide tactics and behaviours for attaining the set goals and targets to help the business grow.
1.1.3. Competitive pressures
Complexity and Error in Medicine’s strategy also takes into consideration the competitive pressures and activities of competitors. The strategy addresses these competitive pressures through suggestive measures and actions to address competition via strategic tactics and activities that ensure sustainability to Complexity and Error in Medicine via adapting to market changes, and evolving consumer trends and demands.
1.1.4. Changing consumer demands
An important aspect of the strategy at Complexity and Error in Medicine is that it takes into constant consideration the changing consumer
trends and demands, as well as the evolving consumer market patterns and consumption behavior. This is an important
part of the strategic direction at Complexity and Error in Medicine as it allows the company to remain competitive and relevant to its target
consumer groups, as well as allows the company to identify demand gaps in the consumer market.
The company
then strategically addresses these gaps through product offerings and marketing activities which give the company
successful and leading-edge over other patterns in the market.
1.1.5. Flexibility and adaptability
The strategy at Complexity and Error in Medicine is flexible and adaptable. This is an important aspect of the strategic direction, and strategy setting at Complexity and Error in Medicine. Rigidity in strategy leads a company and a business to often become stagnant and obstructs advancement, and progression with evolving changes in the consumer markets.
With flexibility and adaptability, the Complexity and Error in Medicine is not only able to benefit from quickly reacting and responding to changing consumer patterns globally, but is also able to locally and culturally adapt its products via localization for different countries and regions. Moreover, the company is often able to proactively predict consumer market changes, and devise strategic changes accordingly to meet the market trends.
1.2. Structure
1.2.1. Organizational hierarchy
Complexity and Error in Medicine has a flatter organizational hierarchy that is supported by learning and progressive organizations. With lesser managerial levels in between and more access to the senior management and leadership, the employees feel more secure and confident and also have higher access to information. Moreover, the flatter hierarchy also allows quicker decision-making processes for Complexity and Error in Medicine and increases organizational commitment in the employees.
1.2.2. Inter-Departmental coordination
Complexity and Error in Medicine has high coordination between different departments. The company’s departments often form inter-department teams for projects and tasks that require multiple expertise. All coordination between different departments is effective and organized. Complexity and Error in Medicine has a systematic process for initiating and monitoring coordination between departments to ensure smooth work operations and processes – and goal attainment.
1.2.3. Internal team dynamics [department specific]
Complexity and Error in Medicine encourages teamwork and team-oriented tasks. Where jobs require individual attention and scope, the company also assigns individual responsibilities and job tasks. However, all employees at Complexity and Error in Medicine are expected to be team players who can work well with and through other members, and who get along well with other people. The teams at Complexity and Error in Medicine are supportive of all embers and work in synch with synergy towards achieving the broader team objectives and goals under the Complexity and Error in Medicine designed strategy and values.
1.2.4. Centralization vs. decentralization
Complexity and Error in Medicine has a hybrid structure between centralization and decentralization. Like many progressive organizations, Complexity and Error in Medicine largely supports decentralized decision making. Job roles at Complexity and Error in Medicine are designed to be carried out with responsibility, and employees often set their goals with mutual coordination and understanding with the supervisors.
However, Complexity and Error in Medicine is also centralized in making sure that supervisors oversee, and approve of the various efforts, and tactics that employees choose to ensure that they are aligned with the organizational strategy ad values.
1.2.5. Communication
Complexity and Error in Medicine has a developed and intricate system for ensuring communication between employees, and different managerial levels. The communication systems at Complexity and Error in Medicine enhance the overall organizational structure. The systematic, defined, and organized communication allows an easy flow of information and ensures that no organizational tasks and goals are compromised because of a lack of communication, or misunderstandings.
1.3. Systems
1.3.1. Organizational systems in place
Complexity and Error in Medicine has defined and well-demarcated systems in place to ensure that the business operations are managed effectively and that there are no conflicts or disputes. The systems at Complexity and Error in Medicine are largely departmental in nature, and include, for example:
- Human resource management
- Finance
- Marketing
- Operations
- Sales
- Supply chain management
- Public Relation Management
- Strategic leadership
1.3.2. Defined controls for systems
Each of the defined and demarcated systems at Complexity and Error in Medicine has especially designed tools and methods as controls for evaluating performance and goal attainment. These controls and measures are designed specifically in different departments based on the nature of their tasks and responsibilities. Moreover, each department also designs specific controls for members for performance evaluation, as well as for inter-departmental tasks and responsibilities.
1.3.3. Monitoring and evaluating controls
Complexity and Error in Medicine continually evaluates its systems through the designed controls. This monitoring of the performance is continual and ongoing. This is largely done through observation and informal discussions. Feedback to employees and overall department heads is informally given regularly as and when is required. Formal evaluation of performance is also conducted semiannually – or quarterly, depending on the need and the urgency of the projects and assigned tasks. This is a formal process that is undertaken by supervisors and managers to ensure the identification of performance lags, and suggestive means of improvement.
1.3.4. Internal processes for organizational alignment
Complexity and Error in Medicine also has special processes and methods for ensuring that all departments and systems within the organization are aligned and working in harmony towards the greater business goals and targets. This is made possible through ensuring that all systems are designing and working towards goals and targets specific to their expertise under the broader business vision and strategy. Moreover, the strategic leadership at Complexity and Error in Medicine also ensures that all systems are allocated with resources, and set specific targets to achieve similar business goals in any specific period.
2. Soft elements
The soft elements of the McKinsey 7s model, in turn, include shared values, staff, skills, and strategy. These elements are less tangible in nature and are more influenced by the organizational culture. As such, the management does not have direct influence or control over them. These elements are also harder to describe and directly identify – but are equally important for an organization’s success and improved performance.
2.1. Shared values
2.1.1. Core values
The core values at Complexity and Error in Medicine are defined and communicated to foster a creative and supportive organizational structure that will allow employees to perform optimally, and enhance their motivation and organizational commitment. The core values at Complexity and Error in Medicine include, but are not limited to:
- Creativity
- Honesty
- Transparency
- Accountability
- Trust
- Quality
- Heritage
The Complexity and Error in Medicine business also ensures that all its activities and operations are conducted with high ethical and moral standards that redefined and benchmarked against international criteria.
2.1.2. Corporate culture
Complexity and Error in Medicine encourages an inclusive culture that celebrates diversity. The company has an international presence, and production units that are spread across different countries, as such, Complexity and Error in Medicine ensure that its organizational culture is supportive of diversity, and has internal policies to reduce incidences of discrimination.
The corporate culture at Complexity and Error in Medicine also encourages innovation and creativity by allowing independence for growth to individuals and teams –thus helping them refine their careers as well as personalities. Lastly, the corporate culture at Complexity and Error in Medicine also has a supportive leadership which works towards increasing employee motivation and job satisfaction by giving way to visibility and accessibility.
2.1.3. Task alignment with values
Complexity and Error in Medicine ensures that all its job tasks and roles are aligned with the core values that the company propagates. This means that all activities, tactics, and strategic tactics employed by Complexity and Error in Medicine will reflect its core values, and will not deviate away from these. This is to ensure a consistent, and reliable brand image, as well as an honest organizational culture. In the event of organizational change, the company will continue to ensure that all change management processes and methods incorporate the core values so that the organizational culture is consistently maintained, and systematically changed if need be.
2.2. Style
2.2.1. Management/leadership style
Complexity and Error in Medicine has a participative leadership style. Through a participative leadership style, Complexity and Error in Medicine is able to engage and involve its employees in decision-making processes and managerial decisions. This also allows the leadership to regularly interact with the employees and different managerial groups to identify any potential conflicts for resolution, as well as for feedback regarding strategic tactics and operations. Through its participative leadership, Complexity and Error in Medicine is able to enhance employee motivation, and increase organizational commitment and ownership amongst employees as well as other stakeholders.
2.2.2. Effectiveness of leadership style
The participative leadership style is highly effective in achieving the business goals and vision of the organization. Employees feel to be active members of the organization who are valued for their suggestions, feedback, and input. Moreover, through participative leadership, leaders and managers are able to identify current and potential conflicts within the Complexity and Error in Medicine organization, and actively work to resolve them as soon as possible.
2.2.3. Cooperation vs competition – internally
With its supportive and encouraging organizational culture, Complexity and Error in Medicine gives way to internal collaboration and cooperation between employees, systems, teams, and departments. This cooperation and collaboration at Complexity and Error in Medicine is important since its operations are spread globally, and also because tasks and responsibilities within the company often require inter-departmental feedback and input. Moreover, with increased expansion, and synergy, the business also regularly forms project teams – which function effectively because of the cooperative and collaborative culture within the Complexity and Error in Medicine organization.
2.2.4. Team vs groups
Complexity and Error in Medicine has effective and functional teams and works with them internally to achieve its various business goals and objectives, and complete tasks. The company’s management is encouraging and supportive, and the leadership provides a motivating and pragmatic vision toad achieve. The human resource management system, as well as the organizational training, supports all employees in their growth fairly and transparently. This leads to effective team formation instead of nominal groups within the organization for various projects, as well as department-specific tasks and roles.
2.3. Staff
2.3.1. Employee skill level vs business goals
Complexity and Error in Medicine has a sufficient number of employees employed across its global operations. Employees for different job roles and positions are hired internally as well as externally – depending on the urgency and the skill levels required. Based on this, it is seen that Complexity and Error in Medicine has employees who are skilled as per the requirements of their job roles and positions. All employees are given in house training to familiarize themselves with the company and its values. External training along with in-house training is provided for skill level enhancement.
All job roles and positions are designed to facilitate the achievement of business goals, and as such, employee skill level at Complexity and Error in Medicine is sufficient to achieve the business goals of the company.
2.3.2. Number of employees
Complexity and Error in Medicine has employed a large number of employees. The number of employees varies from country to country as per the requirements and needs of the business and operations. The global team of Complexity and Error in Medicine is an inclusive one that accepts, and encourages diversity, and works in synchronization with members to ensure attainment of business goals. The team member sand employees are the most important part of business success for Complexity and Error in Medicine.
2.3.3. Gaps in required capabilities and capacities
Complexity and Error in Medicine has a well-defined system for identifying potential needs of capabilities and capacities for the organization. The human resource function of the business has a systematic process that aligns all other departments to identify potential vacancies or skill gaps. Based on the nature of the need, the human resource department arranges for recruitments which may be permanent or contractual in nature, as well as arranges training sessions if need be for the current workforce.
2.4. Skills
2.4.1. Employee skills
Complexity and Error in Medicine has a commendable workforce, with high skills and capacities. All employees are recruited based on their merit and qualifications. Complexity and Error in Medicine prides itself on hiring the best professionals and grooming them further to facilitate growth and development.
2.4.2. Employee skills vs task requirements
Complexity and Error in Medicine has defined tasks and job roles and hires and trains employees for skill levels accordingly with respect to those. The company ensures that all its job requirements are met and that employees have the sufficient skills to perform their respective jobs in accordance with the values and culture as well as the business goals and strategy of Complexity and Error in Medicine.
2.4.3. Skill management
Complexity and Error in Medicine pays particular attention to enhancing the skills and capacities of its employees. It arranges regular training and workshops – internally as well as externally managed- to provide growth and development opportunities for its employees. Complexity and Error in Medicine focuses on personal as well as professional growth for its employees and works accordingly with them.
2.4.4. Company’s competitive advantage
The human resource is one of the core competitive advantages of the company. The skills of employees are developed specifically for job roles and requirements at Complexity and Error in Medicine and provide a competitive benefit to the company – where players cannot imitate employee skills or training. This creates a unique and non-substitutable competency for Complexity and Error in Medicine.
3. References
Alam, P.A., 2017. Measuring Organizational Effectiveness through the Performance Management System and Mckinsey's 7 S Model. Asian Journal of Management, 8(4), pp.1280-1286.
Allaoui, S., Bourgault, M. and Pellerin, R., 2019. Business transformation frameworks: Comparison and industrial adaptation. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, pp.1-28.
Arvand, N. and Baroto, M.B., 2016. How to implement strategy more effectively. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 17(3), pp.301-320.
Baishya, B., 2015. McKinsey 7s Framework in corporate planning and policy. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Science Society and Culture (IJIRSSC), 1(1), pp.165-168.
Channon, D.F. and Caldart, A.A., 2015. McKinsey 7S model. Wiley encyclopedia of management, pp.1-1.
Cordell, A. and Thompson, I., 2019. The Procurement Models Handbook. Routledge.
Daft, R., 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analyses. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Doumi, K., Baina, S. and Baina, K., 2013. STRATEGIC BUSINESS AND IT ALIGNMENT: REPRESENTATION AND EVALUATION. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 47(1).
Galli, B.J., 2018. Change management models: A comparative analysis and concerns. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 46(3), pp.124-132.
Gökdeniz, İ., Kartal, C. and Kömürcü, K., 2017. Strategic assessment based on 7S McKinsey model for a business by using analytic network process (ANP). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), pp.2222-6990.
Grant, R., 2010. Contemporary Strategy Analysis and Cases: Text and Cases. Hoboken: NJ: ohn Wiley & Sons.
Hossain, A., 2019. Strategy implementation: Identification of explanatory variables for successful business analytics implementation in organizations.
Hrebiniak, L., 2005. Making strategy work. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton School Publishing.
Johnson, G., 2016. Exploring strategy: text and cases. Pearson Education.
Král, P. and Králová, V., 2016. Approaches to changing organizational structure: The effect of drivers and communication. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), pp.5169-5174.
Puranam, P. and Vanneste, B., 2016. Corporate strategy: Tools for analysis and decision-making. Cambridge University Press.
Ravanfar, M.M., 2015. Analyzing Organizational Structure based on the 7s model of McKinsey. Global Journal of Management And Business Research.
Shaqrah, A.A., 2018. Analyzing business intelligence systems based on 7S model of McKinsey. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR), 9(1), pp.53-63.
Singh, A., 2013. A study of role of McKinsey's 7S framework in achieving organizational excellence. Organization Development Journal, 31(3), p.39.
Singh, R., 2018. Developing Competitive Strength: Biggest Challenge for the Organizations. Managing Editor, p.65.
Zincir, O. and Tunç, A.Ö., 2017. An Imagination of Organizations in the Future: Rethinking McKinsey's 7S Model. In Strategic Imperatives and Core Competencies in the Era of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 101-125). IGI Global.
4. Appendix
Hard elements |
|
||||||||
Soft elements |
|
Table 1McKinsey 7S model - summary
Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here.
Related Articles
- Corporate Social Responsibility of Complexity and Error in Medicine
- Complexity and Error in Medicine 5C Marketing Analysis
- The vision statement of Complexity and Error in Medicine
- Organizational Culture of Complexity and Error in Medicine
- Complexity and Error in Medicine Generic and Intensive Growth Strategies
- Complexity and Error in Medicine Case Study Analysis & Solution
- Complexity and Error in Medicine Case Solution
- Ansoff Matrix of Complexity and Error in Medicine
- Blue Ocean Strategy of Complexity and Error in Medicine
- Hofstede Cultural Model of Complexity and Error in Medicine
- Porters Diamond Model of Complexity and Error in Medicine
- Resource Based View Of The Firm - Complexity and Error in Medicine
- VRIN/VRIO Analysis Of Complexity and Error in Medicine
- Net Present Value (NPV) Analysis of Complexity and Error in Medicine
- WACC for Complexity and Error in Medicine
Delon Martin
5.0
I hate to write the assignment every weekend. There should be some free time for students to relax their minds. This service is at the front to issue me a joyful time and I'm indebted to it.
Alexis Stephen
5.0
This paper writing brand is the best to choose. I'm really happy that I found this service. Truly recommended.
Besho Adams
5.0
My experience with this service is mind-blowing. First, affordable prices made me feel free from the budget’s tension. Second, on-time delivery provided me peace. Third, this last and the most aching point for me is the content of the assignment. Thank you so much for providing all these advantages under one site.
Hussain Basam
5.0
This is courteous customer service because the quality of the work was just the best.
Keung Ma
5.0
It was difficult for me to get admission into my intended university with the poor result so I hired this service for a research paper and contained the paper that let me enter into my desired university. I’m posting a review here at the university playground.
Charles Hong
5.0
If someone is looking for high-quality paper, he/she must hire this service. My research paper was above and beyond from assumptions. Thanks a lot!
Next Articles
- 18528-Oxford-Health-Plans-A-Specialty-Management-Mckinsey-7s
- 18529-Implementing-an-Electronic-Health-Record-at-the-Central-City-Medical-Group-Mckinsey-7s
- 18530-Apollo-Hospitals-of-India-A-Mckinsey-7s
- 18531-Middletown-General-Hospital-Emergency-Department-Observation-Unit-Analysis-Exercise-Mckinsey-7s
- 18532-Nanjing-Gulou-Hospital-Honoring-the-Heritage-and-Building-the-Future-Mckinsey-7s
- 18533-Press-Ganey-and-HCAHPS-Mckinsey-7s
- 18534-American-Medical-Association-Sunbeam-Deal-A-Serpent-on-the-Staff-Meets-Chainsaw-Al-Mckinsey-7s
- 18535-Lean-Process-Improvements-at-Cleveland-Clinic-Mckinsey-7s
- 18536-West-German-Headache-Center-Integrated-Migraine-Care-Mckinsey-7s
- 18537-Abiomed-and-the-AbioCor-Clinical-Trials-A-Mckinsey-7s
Previous Articles
- 1-Making-the-Case-Mckinsey-7s
- 2-Joe-Smith-s-Closing-Analysis-B-Mckinsey-7s
- 3-Joe-Smith-s-Closing-Analysis-A-Spanish-Version-Mckinsey-7s
- 4-GMAC-The-Pipeline-Mckinsey-7s
- 5-On-Writing-Teaching-Notes-Well-Mckinsey-7s
- 6-Exxon-Corp-Trouble-at-Valdez-Mckinsey-7s
- 7-Ashland-Oil-Inc-Trouble-at-Floreffe-A-Mckinsey-7s
- 8-Ashland-Oil-Inc-Trouble-at-Floreffe-B-Mckinsey-7s
- 9-Ashland-Oil-Inc-Trouble-at-Floreffe-C-Mckinsey-7s
- 10-Ashland-Oil-Inc-Trouble-at-Floreffe-D-Mckinsey-7s
Be a Great Writer or Hire a Greater One!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Essay48 with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!