Sterling Household Products Company

5 Pages   |   1,450 Words

Combine the various valuation principles and methods to help Sterling evaluate an important strategic acquisition. The write up should address and defend the assumptions that underlie the inputs to the analysis before proceeding to present the results. The following questions should be addressed in the report:

Yes, We Can Help!

We promise to deliver high quality papers on time which will improve your grades. Get help now!

Plagiarism Free Work
Best Price Guarantee
100% Money Back Guarantee
Top Quality Work
The company should use the discounted free cash flow method to find out the enterprise value of the company at the present value and then compare it with the acquisition cost to find out if it is in the best interest of the company to acquire the target company or not. In order to conduct the discounted cash flow analysis, the weighted average cost of capital for the target company should be calculated. The risk free rate given is 3.1% and the market risk premium given in the case is 5%, using this information, cost of equity can be found out using the following formula:
Cost of equity = Rf + (Rm-Rf) = 3.1% + 1.2*5% = 9.1%
Total liabilities of the company at the end of year 2012 are \$307 million and the stockholder’s equity is \$1,133 million, the capital structure of the company can be computed as follows:
Debt % = (307)/ (307+1133) = 21.32%
Equity% = 1-Debt% = 78.77%
Assuming the cost of debt to be around 7% and the relevant tax rate to be 35%, the weighted average cost of capital may be computed as follows:
WACC = (Weight of the debt)*(Cost of debt)*(1-tax rate) + (Weightage of equity)*(cost of equity)
= (21.32%)*(7%)*(1-35%) + (78.77%)*(9.1%) = 8.13%
This weighted average cost of capital should be used as the discount rate to find out the present value of the projected free cash flows of the target company.

What are the amounts and timing of the acquisition investment’s free cash flow from 2013 through 2022? What is the terminal value of the final 10 years of the acquisition, as of 2022? What is the NPV to Sterling of this base investment?

Using the income statement and the balance sheet projections of the target company, free cash flows for the next 10 years can be computed using the following formula:
Free Cash Flow = Net Operating Profit after Taxes + Depreciation – Changes in the net working capital –capital expenditure
Using this formula, free cash flows for all the years from 2013 till 2022 have been calculated in the excel sheet. The terminal cash flows at the end of the year 2022, which gives the estimated present value of free cash flows of next ten years after 2022, can be computed by multiplying the free cash flow value of the year 2022 with the multiple i.e. 8.85. The free cash flow at the end of the year 2022 comes out to be around \$23,954,480. The terminal value of the free cash flows can be found out by multiplying this value by 8.85, which comes out to be around \$211,997,180. The Enterprise value of the project for the next 20 years can be found out by discounting all the free cash free flows and the total enterprise value comes out to be \$236,485,000.  The net present value of the project can be found out by subtracting the cost of acquisition from this present value of enterprise value.

Sterling uses a terminal value multiple of nine for the products unit for the years 2023 through 2032. Alternatively, assess terminal value using multiples 9use a revenue multiple). Compare your multiple valuation to that implied by Sterling’s terminal value multiple approach. If there is a significant difference, why do you think that is the case? Which valuation would you recommend to use and why?

The terminal value of the cash flow for next 10 years after 2022 can be found by calculating the free cash flow as the percentage of the revenue. The free cash flow for year 2022 is 13% of the revenue for that year and hence, free cash flow for next 10 years can be projected by taking 13% value of the revenue. Total present value of these ten free cash flows as of yearend 2022 will give the terminal value calculated using revenue multiple. This terminal value, as shown in the calculations, comes out to be around \$180,363,000. This terminal value is far less than that terminal value calculated using 9 as a multiple for the free cash flow value of year end 2022. Terminal value calculated using revenue multiple is much more reliable than the other multiple, and hence, it should be proffered. Terminal value calculated using revenue multiple gives more realistic and conservative results, which should be proffered over arbitrary multiple of 9.

What are the amounts and timing of the follow-up expansion investment opportunity’s free cash flow from 2013 through 2022? What is the terminal value of the final 10 years of the follow-up acquisition, as of 2022? What is the NPV of this follow-up investment and the combined base and expansion investments?

The terminal value of the follow up expansion project, using 9 as the multiple has been calculated to be \$215,590,000 as of yearend 2022. The present value of the follow up investment expansion opportunity can be found out by discounting the terminal value of cash flow to the time zero i.e. year 2012. The present value of the follow up expansion project, when discounted at WACC comes out to be \$98,666,000. The NPV of this follow up project and the initial ten year project, combines comes out to be around \$116,485,000 as of yearend 2012.

Is acquisition of Montagne Medical’s germicidal, sanitation and antiseptic products unit value-additive to Sterling?

The Enterprise Value of the project sing the discounted cash flow method comes out to be around \$236,485,000, which is far less than the acquisition cost of the project. Calculations show that the net present value of the project comes out to be around \$116,485,000. This is a very significant positive net present value and hence, Sterling should acquire Montage Medical’s germicidal, sanitation and antiseptic product units.

What are the strategic issues associated with the proposed acquisition? What uncertainties or trends do you see which could make the acquisition more or less attractive on both a financial and strategic basis?

Although the nature of the business of the target company is very closely related to the Sterling Company’s business, the NPV of the project seems overstated because of some of the unrealistic assumptions. It has been assumed in the analysis that the revenue will at a high rate of 24%, which in the investment horizon of 20 years may become very difficult to achieve.

Suppose you knew that the acquisition will be financed by a \$120 million loan repaid in equal installments over the 20 year life of the project. Assume that the project will not incur any additional debt over its life. What is the value of this acquisition to Sterling under this financing scenario? Is this value lower and higher than the value you estimated above? Why?

If it is assumed that the cost of total debt incurred to finance the acquisition of the target company is 7%, then the free cash flows should be discounted at the after tax cost of debt. Since, the cost of debt is approximately 7% and the tax rate applicable is 35%, the after tax cost of debt for the company comes out to be 4.55%. Enterprise Value of the company under all debt acquisition scenarios can be found out by discounting the free cash flows at the weighted average cost of capital as this rate is the opportunity cost of acquiring the target firm. The existing debt in the balance sheet of the sterling household company is \$307 million. After the borrowing of additional debt of \$120 million, the total liabilities of the company will rise to \$427 million and the total capital of the company increases to \$1560 million. The present value of free cash flows; in this case, should be calculated using the cost of debt as the discount rate, which comes out to be approximately \$302 million and NPV comes out to be \$182,216,000.This value is lower than the NPV calculated above because the discount rate used in this case was lower than WACC.